The Prince of Pot And Jodie – Issue #66
Posted by gestroud Thursday, January 21, 2010 | 2 views
 |
Please support Pot-TV and Subscribe
From the archives of Pot-TV Originally aired on June 11th, 2007. Please note that the Prince of Pot intro has been cut due to copyright considerations. Please visit the Pot-TV link at the bottom of the page for an unedited version of this show with the Intro sequence intact. Jodie and Marc talk about the latest issue of Cannabis Culture Magazine that's hitting the newsstands now. http://pot.tv/archive/shows/pottvshowse-4501.html |
From:
PotTVNetwork Views:
261  29
ratings |
| Time: 07:02 |
More in News & Politics |
The Prince of Pot and Jodie – Issue #66
Source: Uploads by PotTVNetwork
Tags:
cannabis culture magazine, Jodie Issue, News, TV
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...Leave a Reply
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and so on. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
The material in this site is provided for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended to be a substitute for a health care provider's consultation. Please consult your own appropriate health care provider about the applicability of any opinions or recommendations with respect to your own symptoms or medical conditions. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.
(4.50 out of 5)
