Bid to Legalize Marijuana in California Takes Key Step
Posted by gestroud Sunday, January 31, 2010 | 0 views
Howard Dillon unloads boxes of signatures as Judge James P. Gray looks on at the Los Angeles County registrar/recorder-county clerk’s office in Norwalk. (Photo by Francine Orr)Proponents of an initiative to make California the first state to legalize marijuana have collected about 693,800 signatures, virtually guaranteeing that the measure will appear on a crowded November ballot.
“This is a historic first step toward ending cannabis prohibition,” said Richard Lee, the measure’s main backer.
Bid to Legalize Marijuana in California Takes Key Step
Source: Cannabis Culture Magazine
Tags:
California, Francine Orr Proponents, Howard Dillon, Judge James, Marijuana, Richard Lee
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...Leave a Reply
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and so on. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
The material in this site is provided for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended to be a substitute for a health care provider's consultation. Please consult your own appropriate health care provider about the applicability of any opinions or recommendations with respect to your own symptoms or medical conditions. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.
(4.50 out of 5)
